The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Fundamental error in standard jury instructions, dismissal of complaints for failure to state claims for relief, and espresso-and-peppercorn-rubbed Bison with fingerling potatoes and sauteed sage
Criminal law -- Attempted second degree murder -- Jury
instructions -- Trial court committed fundamental error by giving standard jury
instruction on attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offense of
attempted second degree murder
JEROME J. FERRIER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
1st District.
Criminal law -- Battery on law enforcement officer --
Trespass -- Evidence -- Argument -- Trial court erred in denying motion in
limine to preclude prosecutor from highlighting defendant's alleged use of
racial slurs against law enforcement officer where defendant's use of
derogatory terms did not tend to prove any element of offenses charged -- State
cannot show that error was harmless where derogatory terms were highlighted in
opening statements, during witness testimony, and in closing argument --
Although defendant was acquitted on charge of battery on law enforcement
officer, state cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that inflammatory
references and prosecutorial argument centered on racial slurs did not
improperly influence jury on trespass charge
JULIANN GUERRERO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
4th District.
Health care fraud -- Sentencing -- Federal guidelines --
Reasonableness of sentence -- Non-custodial sentence to probation for “time
served” while on pre-trial release awaiting sentence for five-year $3 million
health care fraud scheme, based on defendant's full restitution payment, his
performance of community service, and rising costs of incarceration, was
substantively unreasonable where sentence carried guidelines range of 57 to 71
months and sentence does not reflect seriousness and extent of crime, promote
respect for law, provide just punishment, or adequately deter other similarly
inclined health care providers -- Sentence fails to achieve the important goal
of general deterrence when sentencing in a white-collar crime prosecution --
One of primary objectives of the sentence in a health care fraud prosecution is
to send a message to other health care providers that billing fraud is a
serious crime that carries with it a correspondingly serious punishment, and
defendant's sentence sends the opposite message -- Sentencing Guidelines
authorize no special sentencing discounts on account of economic or social
status -- Sentence was procedurally reasonable where advisory guidelines range
was calculated accurately and district court cited several Section 3553(a)
factors as basis for variance below Guidelines range
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICK A.
KUHLMAN, Defendant - Appellee. 11th Circuit.
Torts -- Maritime law -- Dismissal of complaint --
Consideration of matters outside four corners of complaint -- Where
defendant/employer filed motion to dismiss plaintiff/employee's complaint
alleging Jones Act negligence, unseaworthiness, failure to provide maintenance
and cure, and failure to treat on ground that employment contract contained
forum selection clause requiring plaintiff to file action in federal court,
trial court erred in denying motion to dismiss on ground that it could not look
to copy of employment contract attached to motion to dismiss in ruling on
motion -- Although, as a general rule, trial court is limited to allegations
within four corners of complaint when considering motion to dismiss, there are
exceptions to this general rule -- Court could properly consider copy of
employment contract although it was not attached to complaint
STEINER TRANSOCEAN LIMITED, Appellant, vs. MILENA EFREMOVA,
Appellee. 3rd District.
Torts -- Premises liability -- Trip and fall on allegedly
unsafe walkway -- Error to enter default judgment against defendant that was
not the owner of the property on date when plaintiff's injury occurred --
Default judgment may not be entered against defendant on a complaint which
wholly fails to state a cause of action against the defendant -- Because
complaint failed to state a claim against defendant, trial court erred in
failing to grant defendant's motion to vacate judgment as void
MAUNA LOA INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant, v. ANAMARIA SANTIAGO,
Appellee. 3rd District.
The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.