The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Monday, June 30, 2014
Copyright infringement, insurance coverage, mortgage foreclosure limitations of actions, and farm-raised duck grilled with lavender honey
Copyrights -- Infringement --
Exclusive right to perform copyrighted work publicly -- Transmit Clause --
Seller of service that allows its subscribers to watch television programs over
Internet at about same time as programs are broadcast over the air infringes
copyright owners' exclusive right to perform their copyrighted work publicly --
Infringer “perform[s]” copyright owners' works “publicly” as those terms are
defined in Transmit Clause of Copyright Act
AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES,
INC., et al., Petitioners v. AEREO, INC., fka BAMBOOM LABS, INC. U.S. Supreme
Court.
Forfeiture -- In rem civil
forfeiture -- Seizure of substitute assets -- Seizure of bank accounts as
substitute assets where no link is established between alleged criminal
activity and bank accounts -- Section 932.703(5), Florida Statutes, does not
authorize the seizure of substitute assets prior to a forfeiture hearing --
Statute is intended to be used once a forfeiture has been ordered
SATISH B. PATEL, Appellant, v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, etc., Appellee. 5th District.
Insurance -- Fire -- Ordinance or
law coverage endorsement -- Provision of ordinance or law endorsement which
provided that insurer would not pay for increased cost of construction due to
enforcement of ordinance or law unless repairs or replacement are made within
two years after loss was a forfeiture provision, and was waived by insurer --
Insurer waived the provision by failing to bring the provision to insured's
attention despite knowing that insured expected the entire claim to be paid and
by continuing to adjust the entire claim after the two-year period expired
AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY
f/k/a SHEFFIELD INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CARIBBEAN
BEACH CLUB ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 2nd District.
Mortgage foreclosure --
Limitation of actions -- Trial court properly dismissed complaint to cancel
mortgages which alleged the statute of limitations had run on their enforcement
since the time mortgagee had originally filed suit to foreclose for default,
and during which time mortgagee voluntarily dismissed foreclosure complaint --
Each payment default that is less than five years old still creates a basis for
a subsequent foreclosure action; hence, the note and mortgage remain a valid
and enforceable lien -- Voluntary dismissal was not an adjudication on the
merits and therefore will not support a claim of res judicata
EVERGRENE PARTNERS, INC.,
Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee, JPMORGAN CLEARING CORP., AS SUCCESSOR
IN INTEREST TO BEAR STEARNS RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE
& CO., and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Appellees. 4th
District.
Mortgage foreclosure -- Standing
-- Claim that mortgagee failed to prove standing due to an undated endorsement
on the note -- Unavailable transcript -- Because a transcript of the
proceedings is not available for review, and witnesses may well have testified
at the non-jury trial that the note was acquired by mortgagee prior to
institution of the suit, trial court is entitled to presumption of correctness
in its entry of final judgment of foreclosure -- Civil procedure -- No merit to
claim case was not properly set for trial as case was at issue and trial court
provided proper notice of its sua sponte setting the case for trial -- Nothing
in the record shows mortgagor objected to trial court's setting the case for
trial; hence, even if meritorious, the issue was not preserved
WINSTON MUHAMMAD and JANET
MUHAMMAD, Appellants, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Appellee. 4th District.
Real property -- Bert J. Harris,
Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act -- Settlement agreement -- Trial
court was without jurisdiction to review and approve settlement agreement which
was entered into more than four years after property owners had filed suit
seeking compensation under Bert Harris Act -- Settlement agreement did not
comply with presuit settlement timeline set forth in statute, and presuit
settlement procedures were not available to parties at time they entered into
agreement
COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. FRANCIS D. HUSSEY, JR., and
MARY P. HUSSEY, husband and wife; WINCHESTER LAKES CORPORATION; THE HONORABLE
RICK SCOTT, Governor of the State of Florida; and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION; and COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON
SOCIETY, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.
The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you for sharing valuable information. Nice post. I enjoyed reading this post. The whole blog is very nice found some good stuff and good information here Thanks..Also visit my page. Mortgages in florida As a premier Florida mortgage lender, Federated Mortgage Services can match you with the best Florida mortgage financing programs from hundreds of lenders.
ReplyDelete