The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Monday, July 27, 2015
Attorney fees under 57.105, sham pleadings, commercial leases, and sauteed day lillies with fresh sage and organic goat cheese
Attorney's
fees -- Appellate fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or
applicable law -- Attorney's fees assessed against appellant and its counsel
because of frivolous claim in initial brief that appellee's counsel made
misleading statements to trial court at hearing on motion to dismiss
ASPEN
AIR CONDITIONING, INC., Appellant, vs. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, et
al., Appellees. 3rd District.
Civil
procedure -- Default -- Abuse of discretion to enter judicial default against
defendants as sanction for failure by defendants and their counsel to respond
to discovery, failure to appear at court-ordered mediation, and failure to
appear for calendar call without considering factors enumerated in Kozel v.
Ostendorf and making explicit findings on each factor -- Where counsel is
involved in conduct to be sanctioned Kozel analysis is required before entering
judicial default, and failure to do so is, by itself, basis for remand
DOROTHY
CHAPPELLE, CALVIN JOHNSON and EVELYN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. SOUTH FLORIDA
GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM, INC., Appellee. 4th District.
Civil
procedure -- Sham pleadings -- Action by individual plaintiff against law firm
claiming that law firm failed to give credit to plaintiff for $50,000 retainer
against fee awarded to law firm as required by fee agreement -- Trial court
erred in striking plaintiff's pleadings as a sham on the ground that because
plaintiff had treated the $50,000 as a capital contribution to his company only
the company had the right to bring the action -- Record does not show that
pleadings were “undoubtedly false” or that pleadings were a “mere pretense set
up in bad faith without color of fact” -- Torts -- Trial court also erred in
dismissing tort claims of breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and civil theft
on basis of economic loss rule -- Economic loss rule is limited to product
liability context
STUART
N. BORNSTEIN, Appellant, v. IRA MARCUS, individually, IRA MARCUS, P.A., a
Florida corporation, and GRANADA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,
Appellees. 4th District.
Contracts
-- Commercial lease -- Eviction -- Error to grant summary judgment in favor of
plaintiff on claim for eviction where there were genuine issues of material
fact about occurrence of alleged defaults and lessor's correction of any
defaults within terms of lease and whether alleged violations of lease were
material; and where plaintiff failed to refute affirmative defenses, that
plaintiff had failed to give requisite notice of breach and opportunity to cure
and that eviction would cause inequitable forfeiture, or to establish that
these defenses were legally insufficient
ATRIA
GROUP, LLC, Appellant, v. ONE PROGRESS PLAZA, II, LLC, Appellee. 2nd District.
Dissolution
of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Stock shares -- Valuation -- Trial
court erred in setting value for shares of stock to be transferred from husband
to wife without hearing parties' full evidence regarding value and, instead,
setting the value at the average between value placed on stock by husband and
value placed on stock by wife -- Remand for further proceedings
MICHELLE
TUCKER, Appellant, v. LEONARD TUCKER, Appellee. 4th District.
Insurance
-- Business owners's policy -- Breach by insured of policy condition requiring
insured to maintain burglary alarm system monitored by a security company and
to notify insurer if it became aware of any suspension or impairment of the
system -- In entering summary judgment finding that insured was entitled to
recover for loss resulting from burglary even though insured had not maintained
burglary alarm system monitored by security company because insurer was not
prejudiced by the breach, trial court improperly focused solely on the fact
that the burglary would not have been detected even if the alarm monitoring
system had been maintained -- Because insured breached condition subsequent of
notifying insurer of any suspension or impairment of monitored alarm system,
issue to be determined by court is whether insurer was prejudiced by the lack
of an opportunity to decide whether it would cancel the policy, keep the policy
in place with an increase in premium, or waive the obligation to maintain the
alarm monitoring contract
DEPOSITORS
INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. CC&C OF LAKE MARY, LLC D/B/A THE BEACH
SCENE, Appellee. 5th District.
Insurance
-- Commercial general liability -- Coverage -- Declaratory judgment -- Appeals
-- Partial final judgment in declaratory judgment action which determined
insurer's duty to defend insured, but did not determine its duty of
indemnification, is not a final appealable order or an appealable nonfinal
order
FLORIDA
FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PEACOCK'S EXCAVATING
SERVICE, INC., ROYAL CORINTHIAN HOMES, INC., J.L. WALLACE, INC., and MATRIX
CONCRETE SYSTEMS, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.
Torts
-- Equitable subrogation -- Action by tortfeasor and its liability insurer
against whom judgment has been entered finding tortfeasor liable in personal
injury action, seeking equitable subrogation from medical providers who are
allegedly responsible for a substantial portion of the damages in the
underlying personal injury action -- Trial court erred in dismissing equitable
subrogation action on the basis that tortfeasor and tortfeasor's insurer have
not paid the entirety of injured party's damages -- Right to equitable subrogation
arises when payment has been made or judgment has been entered, so long as the
judgment represents the victim's entire damages -- Question certified to
Florida Supreme Court: Is a party that has had judgment entered against it
entitled to seek equitable subrogation from a subsequent tortfeasor when the
judgment has not been fully satisfied?
ALLSTATE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Appellants, v. BASIL THEODOTOU, M.D., ET AL.,
Appellees. 5th District.
Torts
-- Jurisdiction -- Service of process -- Substitute service at private mailbox
was not effective where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the private
mailbox was the only address for defendant discoverable through public records
-- Although plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to serve defendant at other addresses,
that is insufficient to invoke service under section 48.031(6), Florida
Statutes -- Trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to quash service of
process and vacate default judgment
TAMAS
TIBOR KRISZTIAN, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., as
Subrogee of RENEE M. FIORE, Appellee. 4th District.
Torts
-- Nursing homes -- Arbitration -- Validity of arbitration agreement -- Where
nursing home admissions director told patient, who was alert and lying in bed
with her husband standing nearby, that she was there with admission documents,
including arbitration agreement, that needed to be signed, and patient
responded that she wanted her husband to review and sign the documents, it was
error to find that husband was not authorized to sign the arbitration agreement
and that his signature did not bind the patient -- Husband had apparent
authority to sign agreement on behalf of the patient -- Error to deny nursing
home's motion to compel arbitration
FI-EVERGREEN
WOODS, LLC, ET AL., Appellants, v. THE ESTATE OF MAY L. ROBINSON, ETC.,
Appellee. 5th District.
Wrongful
death -- Medical malpractice -- Presuit requirements -- Statutory amendments
which allow for presuit ex parte interviews between potential defendants and
potential claimants' treating health care providers, and require potential
claimants to sign a written waiver of federal privacy protection concerning
relevant medical information prior to instigating a medical malpractice
lawsuit, are constitutional and are not preempted by Health Insurance
Portability Accountability Act -- Amendments do not violate separation of
powers doctrine by intruding upon Florida Supreme Court's procedural
rule-making power -- Amendments do not constitute a special law -- Amendments
do not burden right of access to courts -- Amendments do not violate right to
privacy
EMMA
GAYLE WEAVER, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of
THOMAS E. WEAVER, deceased, Appellant, v. STEPHEN C. MYERS, M.D., WEST FLORIDA
SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS, LLC d/b/a WEST FLORIDA CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC
SURGERY and d/b/a and a/k/a WEST FLORIDA MEDICAL GROUP, and WEST FLORIDA
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a WEST FLORIDA HOSPITAL, Appellees. 1st
District.
Wrongful
death -- Nursing homes -- Jury trial -- Denial -- Appeals -- Certiorari --
Order striking request for jury trial based on express waiver in nursing
facility residency agreement is not reviewable by certiorari
TRICIA
ANN WALTER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Norine C. Walter,
Petitioner, v. SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, INC., d/b/a BRIGHTON GARDENS OF
TAMPA; JAI LARMAN; and CARLA RUSSO, Respondents. 2nd District.
The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
Labels:
appeals
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.