Attorney’s fees -- Offer of judgment -- Although complaint made passing
reference to equitable relief, action was one for damages, and plaintiff would
be entitled to attorney’s fees under offer of judgment statute if he recovers a
judgment in an amount at least 25 percent greater than the offer
FAITH FREIGHT FORWARDING
CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CARLOS ANIAS,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 3rd District.
Certiorari -- Jurisdiction -- Petitioner is not entitled to second-tier
certiorari review of decision of circuit court appellate division regarding
sufficiency of PIP policy language where there was no violation of a clearly
established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice by circuit
court -- There was no clearly established principle of law where there are
conflicting decisions of district courts of appeal on issue, and Florida
Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction to resolve the conflicting decisions
ALLSTATE FIRE AND
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC, a/a/o
ALEXIA BLAKE, Respondent. 3rd District.
Civil procedure -- Default -- Trial court abused discretion by entering
default judgment after defendants filed motion to dismiss and motion to clarify
instead of an answer
SILAS
PIERCE AND ESTATE SALES STARS, Appellants, v. CHRISTOPHER KROHA, Appellee. 5th
District.
Civil procedure -- Dismissal of complaint -- Action by condominium unit
owner against another unit owner and condominium association alleging that
improper installation of carpet on roof of condominium building resulted in water
damage to plaintiff’s unit -- Appeals -- Order dismissing five of six counts
against association is a non-final, non-appealable order where the remaining
count arises out of the same facts as the dismissed counts -- Where claims were
filed against unit owner individually and as trustee, it was error to dismiss
claims against trustee where motion to dismiss was filed solely by individual,
and trustee was not a movant -- Trial court erred in dismissing claims in
amended complaint as barred by statute of limitations where claims in amended
complaint arose from same conduct, transaction, or occurrence alleged in
initial timely complaint, so that amended complaint relates back to initial
complaint
BROOK
ANDERSON, Appellant, v. IRA EPSTEIN, etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.
Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- Trial court abused discretion in
failing to award wife permanent alimony -- Because marriage was long-term
marriage, there was an initial presumption in favor of permanent alimony, and
husband did not present sufficient evidence to rebut this presumption -- Court
erroneously denied request for permanent alimony on basis of figures set forth
in wife’s most recent financial affidavit where affidavit was based on wife’s
current living arrangements -- Permanent alimony is used to provide for the
needs and necessities of life for a former spouse as they were established
during the marriage
CINDI B. CLEMENS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL P. CLEMENS, Appellee. 5th
District.
Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Trial court did not exceed
its discretionary authority by including in final judgment on parenting plan
and timesharing a provision prohibiting father’s discussion of any religious
matters during visitation with children where there was “clear, affirmative
showing” on the record that father’s actions towards children, which he
adamantly believed were religiously motivated, have been harmful to children
MICHAEL KOCH, Former
Husband, Appellant, v. EMILY A. KOCH, Former Wife, Appellee. 1st District.
Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Trial court’s
prospective-only award to former wife of her share of former husband’s pension
on remand did not depart from appellate court’s mandate directing trial court
to reconsider the proper disposition of the marital portion of pension by
considering the factors in section 61.075, Florida Statutes -- Appellate
attorney’s fees -- Trial court erred in denial of award of appellate attorney’s
fees to former wife who prevailed on appeal -- Court’s finding that former
husband was unable to pay appellate attorney’s fees contradicted its prior
attorney’s fee award without any additional evidence or hearing, and was
unsupported by record, given the large disparity in the parties’ incomes
ARVITA M. COLEMAN,
Appellant, v. MICHAEL BLAND, Appellee. 5th District.
Dissolution of marriage -- Prohibition -- Intervenor’s claim did not
survive parties’ voluntary dismissal of dissolution of marriage proceedings
CATHERINE CLAFLIN, Petitioner,
vs. CLARENCE CHRISTOPHER CLAFLIN, Respondent, vs. MSP RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC,
Intervenor. 3rd District.
Dissolution of marriage -- Provision characterizing award of attorney’s
fees and costs as a form of support that is not dischargeable in bankruptcy or
by any other means was improper -- Remand with instructions to strike this
provision
FELIX
DE JESUS GUERRA, Appellant, v. ANGELA GUERRA, Appellee. 2nd District.
Employer-employee relations -- Retaliatory discharge for filing
workers’ compensation claim -- Damages -- Award of damages was excessive in
light of absence of medical evidence that employer’s conduct caused employee’s
medical condition to worsen or caused employee to suffer past or future
psychological harm -- Remand for remittitur or new trial -- Judgment improperly
awarded post-verdict interest -- Error to deny leave for employee to assert
claim for punitive damages where there was a reasonable showing of a basis for
recovery of such damages –
FAITH FREIGHT FORWARDING CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v.
CARLOS ANIAS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 3rd District.
Family law forms -- Amendment -- Memorandum for Certificate of Military
Service
IN
RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. Supreme
Court of Florida.
Family law forms -- Amendments -- Name change petitions
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. Supreme Court of Florida.
Florida Bar -- Rules -- Amendment -- Competence -- Minimum continuing
legal education standards
IN
RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-1.1 AND 6-10.3. Supreme
Court of Florida.
Insurance -- Homeowners -- Sinkhole claims -- The statutory presumption
of correctness afforded to an insurer’s internal report during the
investigation process in the sinkhole statutes does not extend to later trial
proceedings -- Attorney’s fees -- Insured prevailing in action against insurer
-- A prevailing insured’s recovery of attorney’s fees under section 627.428,
Florida Statutes, requires only an incorrect denial of benefits, not a showing
of bad faith on the part of the insurer -- Insurer’s payment of policy proceeds
after suit has been filed constitutes the functional equivalent of a confession
of judgment, thereby entitling insured to an award of attorney’s fees
KATHY JOHNSON,
Petitioner, v. OMEGA INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. Supreme Court of Florida.
Insurance -- Personal injury protection -- Sufficiency of language in
PIP policy to put insureds on notice that reimbursement of medical bills will
be limited by statutory schedule -- Appeals –
Mortgage foreclosure -- Error to grant summary judgment in favor of
plaintiff where plaintiff failed to demonstrate legal insufficiency of
affirmative defense that plaintiff failed to comply with paragraph 22 of
mortgage regarding notice of acceleration -- Affidavit addressed to whether
notice was actually sent to defendants did not address allegation that notice
did not comply with requirements of mortgage
BALBINA A. YOUNG and LAWRENCE E. YOUNG, SR., Appellants,
v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee. 2nd District.
Mortgage foreclosure -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Exceptions -- Business
records -- Trial court abused its discretion in excluding bank’s business
records, which included records from prior servicer, where bank’s witness
demonstrated sufficient familiarity with boarding process which occurred after
purchase of prior servicer’s assets and witness’s testimony established
trustworthiness of prior servicer’s records
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellant, v. ROBERT GUNDERSEN
and JOAN GUNDERSEN, Appellees. 4th District.
Promissory notes -- Power of attorney -- Trial court erred in
dismissing counts of complaint filed by plaintiff as attorney-in-fact under
powers of attorney executed by family members seeking to recover on promissory
notes given to members of plaintiff’s family -- Although notes contained
language barring assignment or transfer of notes without maker’s prior written
consent, powers of attorney giving plaintiff the right to collect the sums due
under the notes on behalf of the owners did not constitute an assignment or
transfer of the notes -- Under the powers of attorney, plaintiff was acting as
an agent of the owners of the notes
LUIS ANTONIO NIETO VILLAMIZAR a/k/a LUIS NIETO,
individually and as Attorney in Fact, Appellant, v. LUNA DEVELOPMENTS GROUP,
LLC, etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.
The Law Lady. For more info about us, click here. To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here
and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, or FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.