We're back blogging with more Recent Decisions of Interest in Dissolution, Attorney's Fees etc. and Garlic White Pizza with Chanterelles and Arugula

I want to apologize to all for being so busy with work and our Recent Decisions of Interest Newsletters that have tripled over the last 6 months.  But I am back!  Stay healthy and safe everyone.

Attorney's fees -- Civil rights -- Prevailing party -- Award of prevailing party attorney's fees and expenses to plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. section 1988 must be vacated and remanded for additional proceedings where jury awarded only nominal damages for defendant's violation of plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal seizure and district court in determining reasonableness of a fee award misapplied the law in measuring significance of the substantive issue on which plaintiff prevailed or public purpose served by totaling up number of times that Gray II, which was decided in plaintiff's favor, had been cited -- It was error of law for district court to conclude that simply because Gray II had been cited more than fifty times during a two-year period, the substantive issue on which plaintiff prevailed must be significant and public purpose served by her victory must be substantial -- When citation-counting is used as a method for assessing the significance of a decision in plaintiff's favor, citation of the decision for humdrum, non-controversial, or long-established points of law do not matter and must not be included in the tabulation -- On remand, district court to decide whether plaintiff is entitled to award of attorney's fees and expenses, even though she recovered only nominal damages; and if so, whether she is entitled to enhancement for delay in payment of expenses and for delay in payment of attorney's fees; and if so, how much -- Calculation errors to be avoided on remand noted
LAQUARIUS GRAY, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Toniko L. Alexander, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTONIO BOSTIC, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff for Tuscaloosa County, AL, Defendant-Appellant, EDMUND SEXTON, etc., et al., Defendants. 11th Circuit.

Elections -- Campaign financing -- Excess spending subsidy -- Injunctions -- Candidate for Republican Party for Governor of State of Florida, who is not participating in Florida system of public campaign financing, moved to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of provision of Florida Election Campaign Financing Act, which provides participating candidates with a subsidy to spend on their campaigns when a nonparticipating opponent spends in excess of statutory expenditure limit or $2 for each registered Florida voter -- Plaintiff is entitled to preliminary injunction enjoining State from releasing funds to opposing candidate under excess spending provision because he is likely to succeed on merits of First and Fourteenth Amendment claim that excess spending subsidy severely burdens his constitutional rights to spend unlimited sums of personal funds and private donations in furtherance of his campaign, burden on his right to free speech is irreparable, and, as district court concluded, balance of harms and public interest do not counsel against an injunction -- Under Davis v. Federal Election Commission, excess spending subsidy imposes substantial burden on nonparticipating candidate's right of free speech and is thus subject to strict scrutiny, which requires that Florida justify the subsidy by establishing that it furthers a compelling state interest -- Even if subsidy furthers stated interest of Florida by encouraging participation in public financing system and indirectly preventing corruption or appearance of corruption, excess spending subsidy is not least restrictive means of furthering the anticorruption interest -- Severability -- Even if issue of severance is premature, excess spending subsidy is severable from $500 contribution limit
RICHARD L. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAWN K. ROBERTS, In Her Official Capacity as Interim Secretary of State of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee, IRA WILLIAM McCOLLUM, JR., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.

Contracts -- Third-party beneficiaries -- Action by homeowners association seeking declaration of rights under crossing agreement between railroad and another homeowners association -- Trial court properly dismissed action on ground that plaintiff homeowners association is not a party to the agreement at issue and not a third-party beneficiary of the agreement -- Plaintiff is not entitled to relief as a third-party beneficiary where parties to agreement did not intend that the agreement be for the benefit of plaintiff, and agreement expressly excludes third-party beneficiaries
VENEZIA LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Appellee. 3rd District.

Counties -- Injunctions -- Trial court erred in finding that county denied property owner due process by not giving proper notice of administrative hearing on code violation citation -- Record indicates that notice of hearing was sent to owner at both his address of record with county and the address listed at the top of his request for administrative hearing -- Further, it is evident from record that owner had actual notice of hearing -- Trial court erred in granting owner's motion for temporary injunction on ground that owner had been denied due process through administrative hearing process on citation, and trial court was therefore entitled to intervene in administrative hearing process
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellant, vs. KEITH WILSON, Appellee. 3rd District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- Modification -- Jurisdiction -- Uniform Interstate Family Support Act -- Trial court had no authority to transfer Florida post-final-judgment dissolution case to foreign state in which both former spouses now reside -- Under UIFSA, Florida court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction over spousal support order throughout the existence of the support obligation -- Correct procedure under UIFSA is to register spousal support judgment in another state for enforcement there; and even after registration, foreign state must send the case back to Florida court to consider any modification order
ANA ALVAREZ SOOTIN, Appellant, vs. JOHN SOOTIN, Appellee. 3rd District. Opinion filed August 4, 2010.

Guardianship -- Trial court abused discretion in appointing ward's son-in-law as her plenary guardian where ward had executed a declaration naming her three daughters as preneed guardians -- There was insufficient evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that the designated preneed guardian is entitled to serve as guardian
MARIANNE MAGILL ACUNA & MARILYN MAGILL, Appellants, vs. JACK DRESNER, ET AL., Appellees. 3rd District.

Jurisdiction -- Service of process -- Substitute service -- Service of process was defective where process server failed to note time of service on copy of complaint delivered to the person served -- Requirement to note time on copy of complaint is statutory requirement of service, and strict compliance with statutory requirements of service is mandated -- Second service of process while appeal was pending did not render appeal moot
JOSE E. VIDAL, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, Appellee. 4th District.

Receiverships -- Ex parte -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Error to appoint receiver for property involved in mortgage foreclosure action without providing notice and opportunity to be heard where mortgagee failed to establish that ex parte receivership was necessary to avoid immediate irreparable harm to mortgaged property or that giving notice and holding a hearing would accelerate or precipitate any injury -- Although loan documents contained provision for appointment of receiver as matter of right and without notice if foreclosure proceedings were instituted, this alone is not dispositive of whether to grant ex parte receivership and provisions of rule 1.610 are not thereby bypassed -- Argument that ex parte receivership was necessary to assist in sale of property rejected -- Argument that ex parte receivership was appropriate because mortgage documents contained assignment of rents provision which provided for appointment of receiver in that context was not raised as basis for appointing receiver; and, moreover, mortgagee did not present verified allegation that any rents were actually being collected on the property or that any such rents were being dissipated -- Trial court also failed to enter appropriate ex parte order where order did not contain any factual findings
JOHN R. DeSILVA, Appellant, v. FIRST COMMUNITY BANK OF AMERICA, a Federal Stock Savings Bank, Appellee. 2nd District.

Title insurance -- Trial court properly determined that title insurance company was not liable for title insurance agency's misappropriation of plaintiffs' escrow deposits for the purchase of condominium units where escrow deposits were received by agency in its limited capacity as escrow agency for developer, and the escrow deposits were not received in connection with a transaction involving the issuance of title insurance binders, commitments, policies of title insurance, or guarantees of title -- Escrow deposits did not constitute funds held in trust pursuant to section 626.8473, Florida Statutes
BERNARD WINKLER, ET AL., Appellants, vs. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORP., ETC., Appellee. 3rd District.

Torts -- Automobile accident -- Damages -- New trial is required where plaintiff's counsel made an improper appeal to passion and sympathy of jury in opening statement, improperly convinced trial judge to limit defense counsel's cross-examination of plaintiff's expert, improperly attacked character of main defense expert during cross-examination, and made improper and prejudicial closing argument
DANIEL GILBERT ANDREW CHIN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM ROGER CAIAFFA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Torts -- Damages -- Future medical expenses -- Abuse of discretion to deny defendants' motion for new trial and motion for remittitur where there was no competent substantial evidence presented at trial that plaintiff was reasonably certain to need future medical treatment -- Remand for new trial or, in the alternative, entry of amended final judgment remitting award for future medical expenses -- Past medical expenses -- Setoff -- Error to fail to determine and apply setoff for personal injury protection benefits to award of past damages
ALICIA E. MONTESINOS AND HUGHETTE ESQUIVEL, Appellants, vs. JAVIER ZAPATA, Appellee. 3rd District.

Torts -- Nuisance -- No error in dismissing with prejudice complaint in which plaintiff sought to recover damages to property allegedly caused by overhanging branches and roots of neighbor's trees encroaching on her property and damages resulting from plaintiff's removal of portions of neighbor's tree intruding on her property
VIRGINIA T. SCOTT, Appellant, v. JULIE L. McCARTY, M.D., Appellee. 4th District.

 

The Law Lady.  For more info about us, click here.  To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, or  FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.

Attorney's fees, condominium associations, future lost profits, and grilled elk wih peppercorn, red onion, and rosemary sauce

Attorney's fees -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Non-final orders -- An order finding entitlement to attorney's fees but not setting an amount is a non-final, non-appealable order -- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

KLING CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. HOLA NETWORKS CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.

Attorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- Administrative law -- Counties -- School boards -- Exceptional student education -- Due process hearing -- Statute providing for award of attorney's fees to prevailing party in administrative proceedings under chapter 120 does not apply to proceeding brought under section 1003.57, which is controlled by procedures outlined in section 1003.57(1)(b)

A. L., by his parent P. L. B., and P. L. B. for herself, and Rosemary N. Palmer, attorney, Appellants, v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee. 1st District.

Attorney's fees -- Receiverships -- Attorney for receiver -- Receiver's attorney lacked standing to pursue award of attorney's fees and costs independent of the receiver where order appointing receiver entitled the receiver, not an attorney, to seek award of attorney's fees and costs, and record reflects that no other court order was entered which would have permitted receiver's attorney to independently pursue award of attorney's fees and costs

SAGA BAY GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, vs. FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF BLANKET RECEIVER, Appellee. 3rd District.

Civil procedure -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Non-final orders -- Order granting motion for entry of default judgment as to liability only is a non-final, non-appealable order -- This type of order was expressly removed from the list of appealable non-final orders -- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

AMMY M. KOGAN, Appellant, vs. MICHAEL MILDENBERGER, Appellee. 3rd District.

Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Forum non conveniens -- Error to deny motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens based on finding that parties had availed themselves of the jurisdiction of the court -- Finding of personal or subject matter jurisdiction not substitute for existence of convenient forum -- Order granting final summary judgment entered while interlocutory appeal of order denying motion to dismiss was pending also reversed

SERAFIN GARCIA ARMAS, Appellant, vs. BANCO NACIONAL DE CRÉDITO, C.A., etc., Appellee. 3rd District.

Civil procedure -- Sanctions -- Due process -- State v. Spencer, which requires trial court to provide notice and opportunity to respond before enjoining parties from filing further pro se pleadings or motions, applies to all pro se litigants, civil and criminal alike -- Error to prohibit further pro se filings in instant civil litigation without issuing show cause order and permitting reasonable time to respond

BRAD M. BOLTON AND TERESA B. BOLTON, Appellants, v. SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR TO VISION BANK and PARASOL WEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellees. 1st District.

Condominiums -- Assessments -- Prior owner is jointly and severally liable with current owner for all past due assessments up to time of transfer of title -- Where condominium association foreclosed on its assessment lien and took title to property while mortgage foreclosure action was pending, mortgage foreclosure action subsequently concluded and third party purchased property at foreclosure sale, association was jointly and severally responsible with former owner back to time when title to property was transferred to former owner, and third-party purchaser at mortgage foreclosure sale was responsible for unpaid assessments back to time when association took title to subject property

PARK WEST PROFESSIONAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, vs. JOHN LONDONO, Appellee. 3rd District.

Contempt -- Direct criminal -- Father's failure to comply with truancy orders requiring him to ensure daughter's attendance at school -- Truancy court judge improperly acted as judge and prosecutor -- Evidence was insufficient to establish willful noncompliance with truancy court's orders

DAVE MOYERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.

Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was ambiguous as to what was required to vacate the unit, and it was improper to hold party in contempt for violation of an ambiguous order

VIRGINIA HOKENSTROM and HOLLY HOKENSTROM, Appellants, v. ENVIRON TOWERS I CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.

Contracts -- Discovery -- Trial court departed from essential requirements of law in entering order compelling defendant in breach of contract action to produce personal financial records where such records are not relevant to any issues in litigation -- Defendant's personal financial information is not relevant to his affirmative defense of plaintiff's anticipatory breach of contract because defendant is not required to establish his ability to perform under contract to be relieved of his contractual obligations based on plaintiff's anticipatory breach

JOHN M. RYAN, Petitioner, v. LANDSOURCE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, Respondent. 2nd District.

Contracts -- Leases -- Damages -- Where lessor breached lease and constructively evicted lessee, ultimately causing the destruction of lessee's business, by failing to repair leaking roof, trial court properly found that prospective lost profits was the correct measure of damages -- Awarding market value for a business that has been slowly reduced to nothing due to defendant's breach would be inequitable -- There was no clear error in trial court's factual finding that awarding prospective lost profits beyond the initial lease term would be too speculative -- Trial court did not err in dismissing lessee's equitable foreclosure and lis pendens where lessee had no interest in underlying realty -- In awarding attorney's fees to lessee, trial court did not err in denying a contingency fee multiplier where evidence showed that any number of attorneys would have agreed to take case on an hourly or contingent basis

KATZ DELI OF AVENTURA, INC., Appellant, vs. WATERWAYS PLAZA, LLC, etc., Appellee. 3rd District.

Creditors' rights -- Supplementary proceedings -- Fraudulent transfers -- Attorney's fees -- Impleaded parties are not liable for attorney's fees and costs in proceedings supplementary -- In such proceedings, attorney's fees and costs may be awarded only against original judgment debtor -- To extent final judgment against impleaded parties purports to reserve jurisdiction to award attorney's fees and costs against the impleaded parties jointly and severally with judgment debtor, judgment is reversed -- Final judgment awarding attorney's fees and costs for proceedings supplementary reversed to extent that it purports to permit writs of execution against all of the assets of the impleaded parties, rather than solely the assets of judgment debtor now in the hands of the impleaded parties as result of fraudulent transfers

KINGSTON CORPORATION GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC.; KINGSTON GROUP, LLC; TAMIAMI HOEHNE, LLC; and THE SOURCE MINISTRIES, INC., Appellants, v. RICHARD KLEIBER WALTER KLEIBER PARTNERSHIP, Appellee. 2nd District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- Modification -- Substantial change in circumstances -- Trial court abused its discretion in finding no change in circumstances warranting reduction in alimony where husband presented unrebutted evidence establishing a forty-percent drop in income from business which he owned and operated, the unavailability of additional money from the business, the lack of substantial assets to liquidate, grim job expectations, and monthly expenses which exceeded his income -- Contempt -- Finding husband was in contempt for failing to pay alimony was not supported by competent, substantial evidence

HENRY M. DRIGGERS, Appellant, v. ROBIN Y. DRIGGERS, Appellee. 2nd District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- Trusts -- Trial court did not err in granting continuing writ of garnishment over any disbursements made from discretionary trusts to former husband for payment of alimony upon finding that traditional remedies for enforcement of alimony obligation were not effective -- Although trusts contained spendthrift provision, a spendthrift provision is unenforceable against a beneficiary's former spouse who has a judgment or court order against the beneficiary for support or maintenance

BRUCE D. BERLINGER, Appellant, v. ROBERTA SUE CASSELBERRY, Appellee. 2nd District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Child support -- Modification -- Foreign state support order -- Jurisdiction -- Under provisions of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, Florida court does not have jurisdiction to modify a Michigan child support order which was registered in Florida under UIFSA where Michigan no longer has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the order; party seeking modification is a Florida resident; and opposing party is a nonresident who objects to Florida's assumption of jurisdiction -- UIFSA is not preempted by federal Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act -- Petition for writ of prohibition granted -- Circuit court required to refrain from exercising modification jurisdiction

JYRKI TUONO JUHANI PULKKINEN, Petitioner, v. KAREN ELAINE PULKKINEN, n/k/a Karen Elaine Brautcheck, Respondent. 1st District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Court's valuation of marital assets and liabilities was not supported by competent substantial evidence -- On remand, trial court must reconsider other orders that stemmed from erroneous equitable distribution schedule -- Trial court did not err in valuing marital assets and liabilities as of the date of filing dissolution petition -- Building that was nonmarital asset of husband at time of marriage was transformed into marital asset where wife was instrumental in improvements made to building during marriage

JORDAN H. JORDAN, Appellant, v. LAURA JORDAN, Appellee. 4th District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Trusts -- Jurisdiction -- Where court had granted former wife's motion for continuing writs of garnishment over payments to former husband from discretionary trusts for the payment of former husband's alimony obligation, trial court did not err in substituting special trustee of trusts as a party to the family law action -- There is no merit to trustee's argument that court did not have personal jurisdiction over him as special trustee and the trust because the court did not grant the motion for substitution until the same date it granted the continuing writ of garnishment -- Trustee voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the family law court when he was appointed as special trustee of the discretionary trusts, filed motions seeking relief in family court, and voluntarily appeared as trustee at hearing in family court

RICHARD K. INGLIS, ESQ., Appellant, v. ROBERTA SUE CASSELBERRY, Appellee. 2nd District.

Torts -- Contractors -- Failure to maintain premises in safe condition -- Business invitee's action against contractor seeking damages for injuries sustained when he tripped and fell over construction debris as he attempted to enter home through the garage -- Error to enter summary judgment for defendant where there was genuine issue of material fact as to whether contractor, the sole possessor of the property at the time of the incident, failed to satisfy its duty to maintain premises in safe condition -- Whether plaintiff's apparent recognition of open dangers within garage resulted in his assumption of risk of entering house by that route is issue to be decided by jury as part of comparative negligence determination

ROBERT SKALA, Appellant, v. LYONS HERITAGE CORPORATION; SEAN CLARK; and SEAN CLARK CONTRACTING, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.

The Law Lady.  For more info about us, click here.  To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.

Fraudulent transfers, habeas corpus, foreclosures and purple spinach with walnuts sauteed in olive oil, greek oregano and garlic

Appeals -- Summary affirmance is appropriate where initial brief fails to demonstrate preliminary legal or factual basis for reversal of the appealed orders

MARTINA SPENCER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT/ BROADSPIRE, Appellees. 1st District.

Attorneys -- Discipline -- Referee properly found counsel, in his repeated rude, abusive and threatening behavior, violated Rules Regulating the Florida Bar pertaining to making a statement a lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, mediator, arbitrator, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer; engaging in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal; violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct; and engaging in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including knowingly or through callous indifference disparaging or humiliating other lawyers -- Referee properly made recommendations as to guilt -- Considering prior similar misconduct, referee's recommended sanction of ninety-day suspension was improper and a two-year suspension is imposed instead

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. JEFFREY ALAN NORKIN, Respondent. Supreme Court of Florida.

Bankruptcy -- Fraudulent transfers -- Avoidance -- Liability of transferee -- Chapter 7 trustee may not recover the value of debtors' donation from defendant church as an initial transferee under Section 550(a)(1) of Bankruptcy Code, because donation to church is avoidable as fraudulent transfer under Section 548 and defendant church served as mere conduit for debtors' donation and acted in good faith and as an innocent participant in debtors' fraudulent transfer -- Church did not have control over debtor's donation, even though funds were deposited into church's general operating account, where funds were specifically earmarked for a third-party charitable organization, defendant separately accounted for donation it received from debtors, and defendant ultimately transferred funds to a third-party charitable organization

In re: ULRICH FELIX ANTON ENGLER and PRIVATE COMMERCIAL OFFICE, INC., Debtors. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.

Civil rights -- Law enforcement officers -- False arrest -- District court properly denied qualified immunity for arresting officer where facts viewed in light most favorable to plaintiff show that he lacked arguable probable cause to arrest plaintiff -- Error to deny qualified immunity to defendant who was not present during alleged false arrest

MONIQUE WILKERSON, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THEDIOUS SEYMOUR, Dekalb County Police Officer, O.B. PARKER, Dekalb County Police Sergeant, Defendants - Appellants. 11th Circuit.

Child custody -- Jurisdiction -- Trial court erred in finding home state of minor children to be Colorado where children had resided in Florida within six-month period prior to father's filing of petition -- Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, children's home state was Florida

ORION CHRISTIAN BARNES, Appellant, v. LACEY M. MORRISON BARNES, Appellee. 4th District.

Criminal law -- Attempted second degree murder -- Habeas corpus -- Ineffective assistance of appellate counsel -- Sentencing -- Trial court's incorrect statement that there existed “testimonial evidence that drugs were involved” indicated court was considering unsubstantiated allegations in its sentencing decision, and state failed to demonstrate that this improper consideration played no part in sentence imposed -- Prejudice -- Trial court's consideration of unsubstantiated factual claim undermines confidence in fairness, regularity, and propriety of petitioner's sentence -- Appellate counsel's failure to raise error on appeal was deficient performance that prejudiced petitioner -- Remand for resentencing

JUSTIN A. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 1st District.

Criminal law -- Counsel -- Appellate -- Ineffectiveness -- Burglary -- Second degree felony murder -- Jury instructions -- Appellate counsel was ineffective for failure to argue fundamental error where jury was provided with the circular instruction that, to commit the offense of burglary, the defendant was required to have a “fully formed, conscious intent to commit the offense of burglary in that structure” -- Remand for new trial

CHRISTOPHER DEAN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 4th District.

Criminal law -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness claim may not be raised on direct appeal where ineffectiveness is not apparent on face of record

JAMES MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.

Criminal law -- Double jeopardy -- Increase in restitution -- Double jeopardy violation resulted when trial court imposed obligation to pay victim's student loans when original restitution order required restitution only for expenses related to victim's medical costs -- New hearing required

TONY LEMAR FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.

Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Malice murder -- District court properly denied relief on claim that state trial court's jury instructions on venue, an essential element of crime charged, improperly shifted burden of proof to petitioner and claim that state trial court's 25-year delay in resolving petitioner's motion for new trial violated his due process rights under Fourteenth Amendment -- Venue is essential element of Georgia offense of malice murder -- Instruction that jurors “shall” consider cause of death to have occurred where body was found created mandatory presumption which violated petitioner's constitutional rights -- Error was harmless -- Delay in ruling on motion for new trial -- Supreme Court has never held that there is constitutional right to speedy direct appeal in state criminal case, and appellate court finds no precedent suggesting that constitutional violation arises from untimely ruling on motion for new trial -- It cannot be said that state court's decision denying petitioner's motion for new trial was contrary to, or unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law

CHARLES EDWARD OWENS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Respondent - Appellee. 11th Circuit.

Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- In awarding alimony, trial court erred by not making findings regarding husband's net income

KARL RENTEL, Appellant, v. SUN RENTEL, Appellee. 4th District.

Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Timesharing -- Modification -- Trial court erred in entering order modifying timesharing agreement which exceeded scope of relief requested, and without notice that modification issue was set for hearing

HEATHER ANN WORTHINGTON, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY GAIL WORTHINGTON, Appellee. 2nd District.

Foreclosure -- Unpaid homeowners association fees -- Trial court erred in denying request to stay proceedings and to vacate summary judgment of foreclosure where defendant notified court that he was serving on active duty in the U.S. Army, attached copy of his military orders which required him to be in Pennsylvania two weeks before scheduled summary judgment hearing, and requested relief under the Soldier and Sailors Civil Relief Act -- Although defendant did not strictly comply with provisions of SCRA, in that he did not provide a letter or other evidence from his commanding officer stating that his military duty prevented his appearance, court should have given defendant an opportunity to supplement his request for stay before proceeding

DAVID S. HIGGINS, Appellant, v. TIMBER SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS, ETC., Appellee. 5th District.

Garnishment -- Wages -- Dissolution of writ -- Trial court erred in dissolving writ of garnishment served on debtor's employer based solely on debtor's affirmations that, pursuant to a vow of poverty, she had renounced all earnings and paid her wages directly to religious order of which she was a member and for which she was purportedly acting as agent -- Debtor lacks standing to assert religious order's claim to garnished wages -- Debtor failed to prove existence of agency relationship where there was no evidence of religious order's acknowledgment that debtor acted as its agent or that it controlled her actions and no evidence of a contractual agreement between employer and the religious order regarding debtor's employment

MERRIMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, etc., Appellant, vs. THERESE UJOWUNDU, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.

Jurisdiction -- Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Evidentiary hearing -- Although summons was regular on its face in contradiction of defendant's allegation, trial court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing after defendant submitted affidavit of non-service alleging summons was improperly left on her apartment doorstep

TIARA DAVIS, Appellant, v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2004-2, a Delaware Statutory Trust, Appellee. 4th District.

Receivership -- Condominiums -- Court's inherent, equitable authority to appoint a receiver in cases involving a non-profit condominium association is not restricted by statutes

GRANADA LAKES VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, vs. METRO-DADE INVESTMENTS CO., et al., Respondents. Supreme Court of Florida.

Res judicata -- District court properly dismissed antitrust counterclaim in instant case where claim raised was identical to claim raised and litigated in another antitrust lawsuit between the same parties, and circuit court affirmed dismissal of that complaint -- Appellees' request for award of fees and costs under rule 38 denied

AKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CNH CA MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ATLANTICUS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.

The Law Lady.  For more info about us, click here.  To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest.